No debate necessary – the United States of Europe is the future. Or is DIY regulation possible?

Working in the EU bubble has its moments. And almost all of them unexpected. Yesterday, for instance, during a dinner I was labelled as right-wing extremist. I have been called a lot, but this was a new and refreshing take on my political views.

The reason for this labelling exercise was that I was at a networking dinner, there are a lot of those in Brussels (Disclosure – I paid for the €30 dinner myself ) and the person sitting to my right and I started to talk and soon the subject became federalism and the EU. Personally I feel that we have enough of federalism in the EU, that we should stop (or temporarily halt) the integration and give ourselves time to debate what the future EU should look like and how we want to achieve it. Akin the debate that has started in the UK. Or at least will start if David Cameron isn’t only paying lip service to the more sceptical members of his electorate.

The person nearly choked on his tongue, initially he was convinced that I was joking but when it became clear that I wasn’t and that moreover I am not the only one thinking this, he reverted to paternalism telling me ”That surely I must understand that…” and ”Of course you realise that it is clear…” To which I answered ”No” to most of it. Or if such was the argument ”Then I think the processes should come to a halt.”

What worries me in this context is that this guy isn’t alone in his paternalistic arrogance, quite on the contrary. This is the prevalent approach amongst the large majority of the Commission employees I’ve met. It’s like they say ”This is the way it will be. Now stop yapping.” Every time we get a piece of legislation it gets worse, more and more national decision powers are transferred to the Commission, to non-elected faceless civil servants that has forgotten the ”servant” part of their designation. Every piece of legislation must always contain a paragraph which explains why the subsidiary principle can’t be used in this instance – normally along the lines that it is better to coordinate on EU level than not. And even if I cringe when doing so I realise that it is often correct.

But there is a way out: voluntary industry co-operation. Much has been done already in various industries, much is being done but so much more can be done. In my world – in fact it should be done. Every time I meet with a lobby organisation and/or industry representative I strongly encourage them to take back the message that ”Do it yourself. Step up to the challenge and auto regulate. Don’t sit around waiting for the Commission to act.” It is the (almost) the only way we can avoid meddlesome EU regulations in every aspect of our lives while ensuring that our nation states remains nation states.

I, for one, believe this is the way forward.

5 svar till “No debate necessary – the United States of Europe is the future. Or is DIY regulation possible?

  1. Harvard Biz Review ‏@HarvardBiz 22h
    The European Union: A Failed Experiment
    Useful summary


  2. yes, the Commission is in a bubble sometimes.
    Of course 27 nations are better than one nation at virtually everything. Do they think we should give up our national football teams and have a European team? Of course it would be a very strong team but the people don’t want it. You have to go at the speed of the people and if failing to take opinion with you means that the UK leaves (followed by Sweden? Then Denmark? Then Hungary?) then we may all end up in a worse position.
    The Commission staff I know are very clever, though, and frequently favour voluntary industry co-operation etc.


    • Going in the speed of the people is not what happens, on the contrary, the federalists have taken the lead and charge ahead without the support of the people and then they are surprised when there are protests. I only hope that the UK debate will spill over to ”The Continent.” In fact, I almost feel that the result of the debate is uninteresting but it is the debate I want and that I feel that we need. The basic question is ” If EU, what type of EU do we want?”

      I can’t help to feel that voluntary industry co-operation is better than regulations.


  3. To me it seems like you are building up a backbone.



Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in: Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Google-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )

Ansluter till %s